top of page

AI's challenge to human creativity


Graphic by Sachi Yamane
Graphic by Sachi Yamane

The rise of artificial intelligence (AI) in creative industries has sparked an important and heated debate: does AI enhance human creativity or threaten to replace it? While proponents argue that AI expands the boundaries of creative expression, the reality is that its rapid integration poses significant challenges to the core values of originality, authenticity, and human ingenuity. Rather than serving as a tool to enhance creativity, AI risks undermining it by devaluing the human element in art, music, writing, and other creative fields.


At its essence, creativity is a uniquely human pursuit, stemming from emotions, personal experiences, and cultural backgrounds that machines cannot genuinely replicate. However, AI art generators, music composition tools, and language models depend on existing works to create content, which makes them imitative. This dependence leads to outputs that might seem fresh at first glance but often lack true originality. Rather than nurturing new concepts, AI tends to recycle and repackage what has already been created, diminishing the distinctiveness that characterizes human creativity.


For instance, the use of AI in music production has sparked widespread controversy. Taryn Southern’s album I AM AI is a groundbreaking example of the intersection between artificial intelligence and music. Released in 2018, it was one of the first albums co-created with AI tools. This album was created with Amper Music, a music composing platform that allows users to create custom music tracks quickly and easily, even without any prior musical experience. The melodies, harmonies, and instrumentals generated by Amper Music were not born from emotion or personal experience but rather synthesized from patterns in preexisting music. This calls into question the authenticity of such works and whether they truly deserve to be celebrated as creative achievements.


The controversy extends beyond questions of authenticity to serious ethical concerns. Since AI models are trained on vast datasets of copyrighted works, their outputs often risk unintentionally plagiarizing the original creators. An example of this issue is, in 2023 when Getty Images filed a lawsuit against Stability AI for training its models on Getty’s copyrighted images without permission. By using these images—many of which were protected by watermarks—AI undermines the rights and compensation of original creators, posing a direct threat to artists' livelihoods. This blatant disregard for intellectual property highlights how AI disregards the effort and value of human creators in favor of automated convenience.


Additionally, the increasing reliance on AI in creative industries devalues human effort and diminishes the cultural and emotional depth of art. Unlike human creators, AI lacks the capacity to inject personal stories, emotions, and cultural nuances into its work. The result is often content that feels impersonal, formulaic, and devoid of the human touch that makes art meaningful. For example, AI-generated artworks may be visually impressive but lack the emotional resonance that comes from a painter’s brushstrokes or a writer’s deeply personal words. The automation of creative tasks risks reducing art to a commodity, stripping it of its soul and connection to humanity.


The widespread use of AI in creative fields also threatens the livelihoods of artists, musicians, and writers. As AI tools become more advanced and accessible, they enable anyone—even those without training or experience—to produce professional-quality content. While this democratization may seem positive at first glance, it creates an oversaturated market where human creators struggle to stand out or earn a living. When audiences cannot distinguish between human-made and AI-generated works, the value of authentic, human-created art is declined.


While AI's role in creative fields offers both exciting opportunities enhance human creativity by providing new possibilities. It erases nature of creativity, who owns the work, and the moral implications of using AI. With the rapid development of AI, it is crucial to strike a balance where AI supports human ingenuity rather than replacing it, ensuring that technology complements creative expression without overshadowing its authenticity.

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
Feature Spotlight: Consulate Circle

At IES, we’re constantly on the lookout for student-led initiatives that not only align with our values of ethical leadership and global...

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page